Final Public Oral Exam: José Edwin Argueta Funes

Hawaiian Common Law: Adoption, Legal Change, and Cultural Difference, 1840-1940
Date
Monday, December 11, 2023, 1:00 pm3:00 pm
Audience
Public

Details

Event Description

Committee:

Hendrik Hartog, adviser
Martha Sandweiss
Rosina Lozano
Sam Erman, University of Michigan
Troy Andrade, University of Hawai'i

Abstract:

The common law in Hawai‘i was not only as a body of law articulated by English and American courts; it was also a lawyerly habit of mind. Following this habit, lawyers argued that the legislative innovations that remade the Hawaiian Kingdom in the middle of the nineteenth century took place against preexisting Hawaiian customs. While these customs were highly informative in the realm of property law, they could also be perceived as troublesome. Litigation over the inheritance rights of adopted children highlights a fear that these customs opened Hawaiian law to the influence of Hawaiian culture, and thus threatened the project of “civilizing” the Islands.

These inheritance suits reveal the common law to be a much more flexible mode of lawmaking than previously understood. They shed new light on a long strand of scholarship concerned with the peculiar way in which Anglo-American lawyers and judges framed debates over legal change: that is, as contests over the relationship between common law and legislation. This scholarship has emphasized the role of the people’s customs in legitimizing different readings of legal change. In Hawai‘i, however, the enduring appeal of the people’s customs met racialized views of Hawaiians, which influenced how lawyers conceptualized the authority of different legal institutions.

These cases also reveal the common law as a site of contestation over the problem of cultural difference in empire. In other imperial regimes, cultural difference was managed and mediated through jurisdictional politics. Hawai‘i does not fit this framework, but these inheritance disputes allow us to consider a different kind of politics, over whether Hawaiian customs could or could not inform the course of Hawaiian legal development. These Hawaiian cases invite us to explore other ways in which the problem of cultural difference might manifest itself in imperial regimes. Indeed, by exploring analogous inheritance disputes in Oregon and Oklahoma, I demonstrate the importance of the common law for how lawyers understood the many legalities across America’s landscape well into the twentieth century.


A copy of the dissertation will be available for review two weeks before the exam. Contact Lee Horinko for a copy of the dissertation and the Zoom meeting link and password.

All are welcome and encouraged to attend.

 

Contact
Lee Horinko Reed
Area of Interest
Constitutional History
Environmental History
Historiography
Immigration & Migration
Imperial History
Native American
Period
19th Century
Region
Pacific and Oceania
United States
Scholarly Series
Dissertation Defense